The difference between an audit, a review, and a compilation (2024)

This article will explore the differences between an audit, a review, and a compilation. Audits, reviews, and compilations are three important services that help businesses and organizations make informed decisions about their finances. We will discuss each of these services in detail to provide clarity on what makes them unique from one another. Finally, we'll look at when it might be most beneficial to use one over the other. With this knowledge, business owners and managers can choose the most beneficial service for their needs.

What are Audits, Reviews, and Compilations?

An audit is the most comprehensive type of assurance service and requires the auditor to express an opinion on a Company’s financial statements prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Practices (GAAP). Audits are typically required as a result of financing, Investor, or governmental requirements. Typically, during an audit, an independent auditor evaluates a company’s internal accounting system and its financial records. The auditor will then issue a report containing the findings of their audit.


A review
is a more limited assurance service and involves the accountant performing analytical procedures on financial statements to get a general understanding of the company’s finances. An important difference between an audit and a review is that an audit provides more reasonable assurance, whereas a review does not and the accountant does not express an opinion. A review is also a potential requirement if the Company has financing.


Compilation
involves compiling a company’s financial information into general-purpose financial statements, such as balance sheets and income statements. A compilation may also involve helping clients plan their budgets or other documents they may be required to report. While compilations are less expensive than audits and reviews, they provide no assurance since no opinion is expressed on the financial statements or other documents.


Comparing audit, review, and compilation:

One way to think about the three services is to think in terms of small (compilations), medium (reviews), and large (audits). In general, the three services tend to differ based on the scale of required procedures, time to complete the engagement, and level of detail.

  • Assurance Level. Audits offer the most assurance that a client's financial statements are free from material misstatements, while reviews provide a limited level of assurance, and compilations provide no assurance.
  • Dependence on Management. For every service, the auditor begins with the account balances provided by management. An audit involves comprehensive confirmation of this data. A review consists of minimal testing of supplied information while a compilation is mainly dependent on provided facts and figures from management.
  • Internal controls. An audit includes evaluating some of the Company’s internal controls; reviews and compilations do not involve any testing.
  • Hours to Complete the Work. A comprehensive audit entails a substantial amount of hours because of the required audit procedures that need to be completed. Conversely, reviews necessitate much fewer hours, while the task related to compilations is comparatively minimal.
  • Cost. Accountants typically bill by the hour or the size of the engagement. Therefore, you can expect to pay the most for an audit because they entail more time, procedures, and information. Compilations require the least amount of time and reviews tend to land somewhere in the middle.

How to Choose an Audit, Review, or Compilation

When it comes to choosing between an audit, review, or compilation, business owners and managers should first consider the level of assurance they need. An audit provides the most comprehensive level of assurance, while a review offers an intermediary level of assurance. A compilation is the least expensive option but also provides no assurance since no opinion is expressed on the financial statements or documents. For businesses that need the highest level of assurance, an audit is the best choice. For those who only need minimal assurance and have tight budgets, a compilation may be sufficient. Those in between can opt for reviews to balance their needs with cost considerations. Depending on your Company’s situation, an audit may be required which makes the decision simple. Ultimately, it is important to consider all factors before making a decision.


In conclusion, it is important for businesses to know which service best suits their needs, and which service may be required, in order to get the most benefit out of their financial statement preparation.

The difference between an audit, a review, and a compilation (2024)

FAQs

The difference between an audit, a review, and a compilation? ›

An audit provides the most comprehensive level of assurance, while a review offers an intermediary level of assurance. A compilation is the least expensive option but also provides no assurance since no opinion is expressed on the financial statements or documents.

What is the difference between audit and review? ›

Evidence gathering: An audit requires extensive evidence gathering and testing, while a review requires a limited amount of evidence gathering. Evidence review: An audit requires a detailed review of the evidence gathered, while a review requires only a superficial review of the evidence.

In which of the following aspects does audit differ from compilation or review? ›

Assurance level — An audit provides the highest level of assurance about the accuracy of your financial statements. A review provides some limited assurance, and financial compilations don't provide any assurance.

What does compiled mean in audit? ›

A compilation is a basic summary of your company's financial statements written by a CPA using data provided by your company. Unlike a review or an audit, this method provides no assurance. There are no tests performed, and the auditor does not examine any internal controls.

What is the difference between review and internal audit? ›

An Independent Review provides limited assurance, whereas an audit provides reasonable assurance that the financial statements are represented fairly and free from material misstatements.

What is the difference between a review and a compilation? ›

A review consists of minimal testing of supplied information while a compilation is mainly dependent on provided facts and figures from management. Internal controls. An audit includes evaluating some of the Company's internal controls; reviews and compilations do not involve any testing.

What is the role of audit and review? ›

The role of the auditor or reviewer is to give a professional and independent on these financial statements. The review or audit of an association's financial report can ensure greater accountability to the members and provide an assurance that all funds received by the organisation have been correctly accounted for.

What is the difference between audit and review in aicpa? ›

Key Differences Between AICPA Audit and Review

Reporting Format and Content: An audit results in an opinion letter and formal report, while a review produces a report that states the CPA's limited assurance.

Which of the following best describes a difference between an audit and a review of a nonpublic? ›

Expert-Verified Answer. c) An audit requires an understanding of internal control, whereas a review does not. A review and an audit are two different types of services that can be provided by an accountant to a nonpublic entity for the purpose of evaluating their annual financial statements.

Which of the following is a difference between audits and compilations in Quizlet? ›

Audits provide a reasonable level of assurance to the users of the financial statements, whereas compilations provide a limited level of assurance to the users of the financial statements.

What is the audit review process? ›

Although every audit process is unique, the audit process is similar for most engagements and normally consists of four stages: Planning (sometimes called Survey or Preliminary Review), Fieldwork, Audit Report and Follow-up Review. Client involvement is critical at each stage of the audit process.

What is required for a compilation engagement? ›

When performing compilation, the accountant should prepare adequate documentation that provides information on the work that has been carried out. Some of the documentation includes the engagement letter, financial statements, and communication with management regarding significant issues identified during the audit.

How do you compile an audit report? ›

10 Best Practices for Writing a Digestible Audit Report
  1. Reference everything.
  2. Include a reference section.
  3. Use figures, visuals, and text stylization.
  4. Contextualize the audit.
  5. Include positive and negative findings.
  6. Ensure every issue incorporates the five C's of observations.
  7. Include detailed observations.
Nov 14, 2023

What's the difference between an audit and a review? ›

As with all levels of service the financial statements are the responsibility of the NPO's management. The primary difference between a review and an audit is that in an audit, the auditor verifies management's amounts and disclosures with evidence provided by third parties.

Can a non-CPA perform an audit? ›

Non-CPAs can perform internal audits used by the organization but are not authorized beyond that.

Do auditors review internal controls? ›

71 The auditor should form an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting by evaluating evidence obtained from all sources, including the auditor's testing of controls, misstatements detected during the financial statement audit, and any identified control deficiencies.

Is an IRS audit the same as a review? ›

You may face an IRS audit after an IRS review. If the IRS reviews your information and detects inaccuracies in your tax returns, it may conduct a comprehensive audit to look into the matter further.

What is the scope of audit vs review? ›

The Scope and Procedure

In a review engagement, financial data and accounting records are examined but the depth and detail of examination are not as extensive as with an audit. The reviewer expresses a lower scope opinion on the financial statements and they issue a report with limited assurance.

What is the difference between audit and review level of assurance? ›

A financial statement review aims to provide the user with assurance that the firm is not aware of any material modifications required in the financial statements. Essentially, it asks, “Do the numbers make sense?” This is a step down from the level of assurance that an audit provides.

What is the main difference between an audit and an evaluation? ›

Audits are conducted according to the Government Auditing Standards, known as the "Yellow Book," issued by the Comptroller General. Evaluations involve assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Duane Harber

Last Updated:

Views: 6086

Rating: 4 / 5 (71 voted)

Reviews: 86% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Duane Harber

Birthday: 1999-10-17

Address: Apt. 404 9899 Magnolia Roads, Port Royceville, ID 78186

Phone: +186911129794335

Job: Human Hospitality Planner

Hobby: Listening to music, Orienteering, Knapping, Dance, Mountain biking, Fishing, Pottery

Introduction: My name is Duane Harber, I am a modern, clever, handsome, fair, agreeable, inexpensive, beautiful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.